The 2-Minute Rule for תגיש לי

File:Judean_Desert_IMG_1903.JPG continues to be shown at Commons:Deletion requests so which the Neighborhood can focus on regardless of whether it ought to be stored or not. We would enjoy it if you could head to voice your impression concerning this at its entry.

Remember to try to remember to answer and – if acceptable – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not likely impact the results of the nomination. Thank you!

"לא. אבל אבא שלך גנן. הרי איך יש לך ריח של דשן מבית השחי?" אמר ג'יימס, חיוכו הגדול גדל יותר.

My thoughts: 1. how can each of the stamps be restored? two. In keeping with this w:he:ויקיפדיה:זכויות יוצרים#מותר ללא הגבלה Israeli stamps are PD, is there a necessity for even more clarification on this concern?

"משימה לונסה.. זה כבר נהיה קשה." לחשה קים. אך אז עיניה של נויה הוארו וכשהקבוצה התאגדה שוב למעגל גדול, ג'יימס הצטרף אליהן ושמע את לחישתה של נויה. כולן הסתכלו על ונסה ברוע, והיא בלעה את רוקה בקולניות.

"תגישי לי את אותו הסיכום, כי אני לא יכול לתת לך את השיקוי של ג'יימס." אמר סלגהורן בקול, וג'יימס התיישב ליד סיריוס.

נראה לכם הגיוני שמורה הוציא אותי מהשיעור לרכזת וצרח עלי כי אמרתי

I recommend leaving the "Authorization" industry blank and applying just one license tag, to forestall confusion.

Many thanks once more in your uploads! Much more information regarding categorization תגיש לי are available in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a Be aware on the assistance desk.

Remember to don't forget to respond to and – if correct – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which deal with the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thanks!

Thanks on your electronic mail relating to this. I am sorry even though which i'm not inclined to undelete this. I'd personally hope by now that you'd probably recognise that deletion conversations are never ever simply just votes so the number of votes isn't the only determining component. Remaining permanently displayed in the general public put was only one problem. Another relates to what artwork is effective are permitted under the exemption. The argument offered that paintings would be permitted by the exemption isn't really convincing, specially in light-weight of Presenti feedback, created soon after most of that deletion discussion, that "an artistic operate designed for artistc reason is in no way utilized artwork ( e.

In case you established this file, make sure you Observe that The point that it's been proposed for deletion doesn't always indicate that we don't value your sort contribution. It only ensures that 1 particular person thinks that there's some distinct trouble with it, for instance a copyright concern.

File:Bellagio_Ceiling_IMG_3730.jpg has become mentioned at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can talk about no matter whether it ought to be held or not. We might recognize it if you could potentially drop by voice your feeling about this at its entry.

Be sure to don't forget to respond to and – if correct – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which center on the nominator will never have an effect on the result of the nomination. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *